Week8---Should AI be used to create Wikipedia entries? YANJINJIN(염금금)

  1.Summary

Artificial intelligence has powerful data processing and automated creation capabilities, which makes it excel in many fields. However, whether to let AI create Wikipedia entries is still a question worth discussing. Artificial intelligence can quickly generate large amounts of text and ensure the accuracy and consistency of the content through algorithms, but it also faces limitations in judgment, information screening, creativity, etc. The advantage of artificial intelligence is its high efficiency, but it lacks a deep understanding of human complex emotions and social background. Therefore, relying on artificial intelligence to create Wikipedia entries may result in a lack of depth and detail in the content, and may even contain inaccurate or misleading information.

2.Interesting  points

The progress of artificial intelligence has brought us many innovative ideas. For example, when generating Wikipedia entries, AI can quickly organize them into concise and easy-to-understand entries by analyzing a large number of academic resources, news reports, etc. This speed and efficiency are unmatched by humans. What's more interesting is that AI can optimize the generated content through continuous self-learning. Over time, its capabilities will continue to improve, and it can even write articles that seem to be created by "humans".

3.Discussion 

Can AI replace the creativity and judgment of human editors? For example, the impact of historical events is often multifaceted, involving multiple fields such as politics, society, and culture. Can AI fully capture these complexities?

Can AI be used to handle Wikipedia's content review work?For example, can AI automatically detect and correct errors in articles, or filter out content that does not meet neutrality requirements?


Comments

  1. ljhwaApril 25, 2025 at 10:54 AM

    I believe it is highly unlikely—and indeed inappropriate—for AI to make judgments about historical events.

    Wikipedia is, at its core, a collection of information that exists on a networked online platform. This information is fundamentally difficult to access without devices like computers. There are still regions in the world where using computers is challenging, and information related to those areas is likely underrepresented on the internet. As a result, information about such regions may be disproportionately influenced by perspectives from relatively powerful nations.

    ReplyDelete
  2. hezixuanApril 25, 2025 at 8:49 PM

    This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the potential and limitations of AI in creating Wikipedia entries, and the questions raised are also very inspiring. To further deepen the discussion, it is possible to consider adding some specific cases to support the arguments, such as errors in existing AI-generated entries or instances of human editing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. CHEN SIWENApril 26, 2025 at 4:17 AM

    AI can assist in content creation and review but cannot replace human editors' creativity and judgment. The impact of historical events is complex and multifaceted, and while AI can process large amounts of data, it lacks the nuanced understanding of human editors. AI can help detect errors and improve structure, but neutrality and sensitive topics still require human judgment. Human editors provide creative interpretation and cross-disciplinary knowledge, which AI cannot replace.

    In short, AI is a helpful tool, but human editors remain essential.

    ReplyDelete
  4. wu wenhaoApril 26, 2025 at 5:03 AM

    Hi，YANJINJIN. Your blog is well-structured and thoughtfully addresses the potential and challenges of using AI for Wikipedia editing. One suggestion would be to include a specific example to illustrate how AI might miss the complexities of a historical or cultural event. This would make your discussion even more vivid and persuasive. I really enjoyed reading your insights!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Lee JaehyunApril 27, 2025 at 11:31 PM

    Based on your content, (3. discussion),
    I believe that while AI can assist with certain tasks like detecting factual errors or flagging biased content, it cannot fully replace the creativity and nuanced judgment of human editors. Historical events, for example, involve complex interpretations across politics, society, and culture, which require human insight and critical thinking. AI can be a helpful tool for supporting content review, but the final evaluation and understanding must still rely on human collaboration and expertise.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more