Blogging through Wikipedia (2025)

Summary ( 러시아의 부패 - 위키백과 ,  중국의 부패 - 위키백과 ) I have completed the task of translating two English Wikipedia articles into Korean. The two articles are "Corruption in Russia" and "Corruption in China," which I translated into Korean. The main task was translating the content, but I also worked on formatting the articles, citing references, writing categories, and inserting links into words, among other things. I wrote the drafts in a notebook and reviewed them before posting the final version on the Korean Wikipedia. I will continue to check for feedback regularly and make corrections if there are any issues. Interesting Points Writing the entire article from start to finish was a unique experience, and it was very interesting. Although it was a translation of existing articles, it felt like something new was created, which made me feel proud. I also felt a sense of responsibility, thinking that someone might benefit from or be positively influenced by the articles I ...

 While editing Wikipedia, I learned many things. At first, I thought it was just about editing articles in an encyclopedia, but as I participated, I realized how deep and complex the process was. I learned many technical things like setting categories, uploading images, writing articles, and citing sources. However, the biggest lessons I learned were about "the accuracy of information" and "the responsibility of editing." Wikipedia is a platform where users can freely contribute, and because of this, wrong information or biased content can easily spread. I realized how much impact the content I contribute can have on others, so I always had to be mindful of that. Because of this, I focused on clearly citing sources, avoiding biased perspectives, and writing in a neutral tone. At first, this was a bit difficult, but over time, I became more careful about handling the sources of articles and learned how to reflect different viewpoints. Moreover, editing Wikipedia mad...

Summary This article is titled “Did You Know?” (DYK) on Wikipedia. At first, I didn’t quite understand what the article was about from the title, but after reading it, I realized that it’s related to the main page of Wikipedia, also known as the front page. This page is part of a project, and it is referred to as DYK, which stands for “Did You Know?”. The article explains the five main goals of DYK, what things are not part of DYK, the rules and the five criteria for eligibility, as well as the process. It even goes into detail about the participants involved in this project, giving an overview of who is part of it. Interesting Points I found it particularly interesting that the article introduces the participants in the DYK project. What stood out to me was the fact that there is a special category for highly active participants, almost like a Hall of Fame. I think this gives a sense of accomplishment, similar to what I saw in the featured articles or good articles. It was also f...

Summary This article explains the use of categories on Wikipedia in great detail. It describes how to properly use the category function, starting from basic page categorization to creating category pages, classifying articles, sorting draft pages, categorizing project pages, and even using templates for categorization. It also explains how to organize categories into category trees and how to use sorting keys. The article provides very thorough and specific information on how to categorize content correctly. In addition, it discusses what types of categories are inappropriate, so we can avoid making mistakes and follow the guidelines properly. Furthermore, there are a lot of additional reference points that are linked as words, like categories, which can help guide users in the right direction. These links make it easier to access more information on related topics. Interesting Points At first, I felt a bit overwhelmed by the amount of information and the sheer number of categories....

Summary This article is from Wikipedia, and it covers the overall process of document development on the platform. It shows how each document can be properly developed and improved step by step. If you are looking to improve the quality of an article, this article provides useful guidance. First, the article explains how to write a good article by giving step-by-step instructions. It also tells you how to find topics that don’t have articles yet or that need to be improved. It suggests starting with a short article and then gradually expanding it to cover the full content. The article even explains everything, from citing sources to how to finish the article. So, if you are struggling with writing an article, it would be helpful to refer to this guide. Interesting Points One of the interesting parts of the article was about "featured articles." It was surprising to learn that there is something special called a "featured article." Not every article is the same, an...

Summary This article contains answers to questions that are commonly seen in Wikipedia. It feels like a manual, and one of the interesting things is that it supports a wide range of languages. In addition to familiar languages like Korean and English, it also supports many other languages, including Portuguese, Dutch, and even some languages I had never heard of before. It seems like you can read this article in a wide variety of languages. The article covers topics related to the project, such as uploading, materials, galleries, and categories, as well as information about copyright, technical aspects like engines, resolution, image media, and details about the public community. The article answers many questions that we might have at some point, and it provides clear answers to them. This will be very helpful when we face difficulties during editing. Interesting Points I found it interesting and amusing that even questions and answers are presented in Wikipedia style. It felt very ...

Summary This Wikipedia article explains the concept of Remix Culture. Remix Culture was also mentioned in last week's Wikipedia article about the Free Culture Movement. It is also known as "read-write culture," which, as the name suggests, gives the impression that remixing and editing creative works are allowed. Similar to the Free Culture Movement, Remix Culture is understood as a concept that is more lenient toward copyright laws. The article uses the example of a book by "Lawrence Lessig" to explain this concept. It also discusses the historical changes from the analog era to the digital age and how Remix Culture evolved over time. The article touches on the various fields where remixing happens, such as books, music, films, and more. Interesting Points First of all, it was interesting because it connected to the concept from last week, but it also felt familiar. What surprised me was that Remix Culture has existed much longer than I thought. I expected it...

Summary This article is about the Free Culture Movement from Wikipedia. It explains what the Free Culture Movement is and provides a basic understanding. The article supports the idea of loosening restrictions on copyright, and you can see a rather generous attitude toward it. The article also mentions other related concepts like Open Access (OA), Remix Culture, Hacker Culture, Knowledge Access Movement, Copyleft Movement, and Public Domain Movement. It made me think it would be good to look up these terms separately to learn more about them. The article even links to these terms. Additionally, the article talks about the background and history of how the Free Culture Movement came to be. Interesting Points Personally, I think copyright should be strictly enforced, so it was interesting to read this article because it presents the opposite view. Hearing a different opinion is similar to learning new facts, and I found it fascinating. It was also surprising to learn that there are sub...

Summary This Wikipedia article is about the culture of Wikipedia itself. The article does not contain a lot of content by itself, but instead shows various subcategories of articles related to the culture of Wikipedia. Some of these categories are not really about culture but are kept for fun, which I personally liked because I enjoy fun things. However, reading this also made me understand a bit more why some people might not trust Wikipedia. There are various categories such as gender, slogans of the day, equality, and emoticons, among many others. Some of these are quite absurd, like "Do not poke bears" or "Do not climb the Capitol building in a Spider-Man costume." I found these articles amusing, but at the same time, I can understand why some people might find them strange or untrustworthy. Interesting Points Until now, through my experiences with Wikipedia and editing articles, I’ve lost a lot of the rigid image I had of it. But after reading this article, I...

Summary This article on Wikipedia talks about the reliability of Wikipedia itself. It informs us that Wikipedia's reliability has been questioned by many people in the past, but it has gradually improved over time. The article explains Wikipedia's editing model, which ensures anonymity, and while this could be a point of concern, it also mentions that Wikipedia's edit history and records make it possible to trust the information. It details the criteria used to evaluate trustworthiness, as well as presenting comparative studies and opinions from experts such as librarians, associations, and journals. There is also a discussion about the reliability of sources, which is similar to what I read in previous blog posts. The article provides examples of several incidents where misinformation was shared, showing the issues that arise when information is not accurate. Interesting Points I think the most concerning aspect of Wikipedia is the issue of misinformation. The fact that ...

Summary This Wikipedia article is about the book titled "Good Faith Collaboration." The article explains who the author of the book is and what the book is about. The book is structured with a preface and eight chapters, and it seems to contain similar concepts to those I have read in previous blog posts, such as the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia and the discussion of Nazis and norms. It also includes the reactions of several critics who have read and reviewed the book. Interesting Points I found it interesting that this book is related to an important concept in Wikipedia. The idea of good faith collaboration is something that actually takes place within Wikipedia. We are editing for free, having discussions in good faith, and working together to create accurate articles. Because of this, it seems that most people in Wikipedia are indeed collaborating in good faith. It may sound a little idealistic, but it feels warm and reassuring to know that this is really happening...

Summary This article explains the controversies surrounding references in Wikipedia, particularly regarding the level of standardization for references and the reasons behind those standards. The article highlights how references are critical in maintaining the reliability and credibility of Wikipedia articles. It also draws attention to the importance of avoiding extremes, such as dividing opinions into conservative or liberal extremes. The article discusses criticisms of Wikipedia and Web 2.0, the challenges of collaborative editing, concerns about access and authority, and various opinions expressed by critics. These points are presented with examples of two authors who illustrate the range of views about how references should be handled. Interesting Points I found it interesting that the standards for references can vary from person to person, and this leads to ongoing debates. Because of this, the constant arguments and discussions about references seemed inevitable. I was especi...

  Summary This article provides a detailed explanation about how Wikipedia reaches consensus on information. It talks about how to categorize homonyms, how problems related to homonyms have been resolved, the concept of consensus, and the IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force) consensus process. The article also explains various ways groups make decisions, such as coin tossing, voting, discussions, and reaching agreements. It provides a thorough explanation of all these processes and how they contribute to decision-making in Wikipedia. Interesting Points I was surprised at how much more systematic the whole process is than I initially thought. I found it interesting that there are technical working groups and international organizations like the IETF, which contribute to managing and ensuring the quality of information in Wikipedia. It made me realize that Wikipedia’s ability to maintain order, despite being an open platform where anyone can edit, is thanks to these kinds of e...

1. Summary ( https://reagle.org/joseph/2010/gfc/chapter-1.html ) This document emphasizes that Wikipedia is not just a website that provides information. It is a community focused on the sharing and expansion of knowledge through collaboration and discussion. It explains that Wikipedia is not just about giving facts but about creating a space where people work together, discuss ideas, and improve knowledge over time. The document also discusses several conflicts that Wikipedia has faced and the ways it has responded to them. It explains how these conflicts have shaped the culture of Wikipedia and influenced how it operates today. 2. Interesting Point One of the most interesting things I learned was about the conflicts related to Wikipedia. I didn’t know about the clashes with extreme groups like “Nazis” or “Neo-Nazis.” I found it really surprising, but what was even more surprising was that they try to solve these problems through cooperation. I thought it was a peaceful way to appro...

  1. Summary I read the reading that was listed in the syllabus for the Friday class. I carefully read the page at this link: https://tinyurl.com/wikiprojects . This page explains a lot about the course, especially about the assignments. It gives many details about what we have to do and how we should do the work. It also shows examples from the past classes, so I think it is helpful to understand how this class works. It was good to see how students before us did their projects and followed the schedule. 2. Interesting Points I found the “student introduction” part very interesting. I used to think Wikipedia was very formal and only for experts because its main goal is to give correct information. But when I saw that many editors are students like me, I felt closer to the community. Also, I read that some people enjoy editing Wikipedia and do it as a hobby. That made me feel that Wikipedia is not only a place to share facts, but also a place to enjoy working together. It chang...

1.  Summary + Link : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jujuheee0408 For my very first Wikipedia edit, I worked on customizing my user page. I used an existing template that someone else had created, and by adapting it to suit my own preferences, I was able to create a stylish and well-organized page. While I kept the original visual elements such as images and layout, I edited the content within the template to reflect my personal style and background. 2. New and Interesting Discoveries I was genuinely surprised at how easy and simple it was to create a visually appealing page on Wikipedia. It only took a few small adjustments to transform a basic template into something unique and personal. I used to think of Wikipedia as a purely text-based, information-heavy platform, but working on this edit made me realize that there is actually room for design and creativity, especially on personal user pages. The idea that design can complement content on such an academic and informative si...