Week 1 - Video Watching Blog—CHEN SIWEN 진사문

 1.summary

At the beginning of the new semester, I have the chance to learn more about Wikipedia and better understand how it works and shares knowledge. In the first class, the professor explained its basic functions and its impact as one of the world's largest sources of information. Wikipedia includes articles, discussion pages, and Wikiversity, and it is considered an important public service project.I realized that even though Wikipedia is free to access, copyright issues still matter, and using resources properly is very important. This semester, I hope to improve my ability to use Wikipedia for academic research and contribute good content, making it a valuable learning tool for me.

2.Interesting Point

Wikipedia's collaborative nature allows volunteers worldwide to contribute and maintain content, showing the power of collective knowledge. This decentralized system is both efficient and democratic, reflecting humanity's pursuit of knowledge. However, open editing also brings risks like false information, bias, and intentional changes.To ensure accuracy and neutrality, Wikipedia has strict editing rules and citation policies, along with monitoring and correction systems to prevent misuse. It is not just a large knowledge base but also a global community that works together and keeps improving.

3.Discussion

How do you view the role of volunteer editors in maintaining the quality of Wikipedia's content?

Comments

  1. YU JIEMarch 16, 2025 at 3:48 AM

    Volunteer editors are crucial in maintaining Wikipedia's content quality by ensuring accuracy, neutrality, and adherence to guidelines through collaborative efforts.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more