Week 2：Deepening Engagement with Collaborative Knowledge Platforms(WU JIACHEN)

 Summary:

  This week, my exploration into Wikipedia's collaborative environment deepened significantly through a combination of insightful videos and readings. By watching "Why Wikipedia" and "How to Leave a Wikipedia Talk Message," I gained a more nuanced understanding of the platform’s evolution and the critical role of communication among editors. The foreword from Reagle’s "Good Faith Collaboration" reinforced the theoretical foundation behind open collaboration, emphasizing the power of collective effort and mutual respect. Alongside completing my first Wikipedia assignment, I began engaging with the second one, which involved hands-on editing and content enhancement. These activities not only improved my technical skills but also provided a practical perspective on how theory is applied in real-world collaborative settings. The blend of multimedia resources and interactive assignments this week has offered a comprehensive look at how digital communities function and thrive.

Interesting Point:

A particularly fascinating aspect of this week was discovering the role of Wikipedia’s talk pages. These discussion forums, often overlooked by casual users, are where the real dynamics of content negotiation and conflict resolution take place. I was captivated by how editors use these spaces to debate ideas, share insights, and collectively improve the quality of articles. The open and transparent nature of these conversations illustrates the strength of Wikipedia's community-driven approach, where every contributor has a voice in shaping the content. This process of continuous dialogue not only upholds the principles of neutrality and accuracy but also serves as a mentoring ground for new editors. It highlights the importance of clear communication and respect for diverse viewpoints, reinforcing the idea that collaborative editing is as much about human interaction as it is about technical proficiency.

Question:

What is the simplest way to resolve small disagreements on Wikipedia?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more