Week 3: Linus Law of people collaboration - Natalie Tian (LookatmiWiki)

Summery of this week learning

I have learned Linus Law about collaboration of many individual should cashed our errors eventually the more people working on can look for errors. eventually, article about something popular will have a lot of people checking for errors. Which answer me more clearly, on the question I have leave in the blog on the question for question for discussion. 


Interesting point during the class

I find one of the point that is very interesting. And along learning how to find a good sources online I wanted to learn more about how to use search engine because it is necessary for me to know all of these basics skills. In order to find that information in the right way and find out quickly The example in the class that I have learned is to use quotation in some words or sentence. Use  minus sign to a language For example, Korean means estimate Korean article. I find this cool and interesting professor suggest me to learn if I have any know about it, and these excuse can be easily find tutorial online.


Question 

I wonder about finding the picture to put in wikipedia I have try to find picture in google search and use the tools function to filter the picture that not have license and can be use in wikipedia but In ending up getting a very few choices even though it’s the topic that we are quite familiar with Additionally, the picture can’t really use in wikipedia. So my question here is “Is there any other possible way to find picture for wikipedia.”

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more