week 4 : Wikipidia edit - ljhwa(이진화)

Summary

   edit

 The document was related to the singer's album, so a source for various figures was required. In addition, there was a lack of source for clear arguments about what they wanted to express. Due to the characteristics of the field of music, non-experts were able to make their own arguments, so they brought the part where the parties introduced the song themselves as a basis. I believe that clarifying the original creator's intent in music is essential to prevent various issues. This is even more important on knowledge-based platforms that serve as repositories, such as Wikipedia.


Any new, interesting, or unusual items learned

Music documents gave us a glance at the recordings of each country. If the source is sufficient, you can think of it as a "receipt" or "report card" of the work.


Identify at least one question, concern, or discussion

Most of the statistical evidence for the document came from the Gaon Digital Chart. The site is fully reliable because it is a country-approved site, but it has a disadvantage that it is less famous than reliable. Wouldn't it be an obstacle to being used as a source of music if it wasn't famous enough for music to be played against the public?

Comments

  1. Yeonseo KooMarch 30, 2025 at 6:33 AM

    When we discuss the popularity of the album, we first think of charts like Billboard, Official, Spotify, and Apple Music. In the 2020s, K-pop has been influential in the music industry. However, it is not easy for all idols to put their names on the charts above. While there are groups with larger global fandom, there are groups with larger domestic fandom. It would be sad to score them just by the size of the fandom or the authority of the chart they entered. If the Korean charts are suitable for describing idols with strong domestic fandom, then let them be! As far as I know, the Oricon chart exerts considerable influence on its own in Japan. I think Gaon will also be the same in Korea.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more