Week1:The experience of editing Wikipedia--ZHANG XIAOTONG(장효동)

 Summary 

Wikipedia is the world's largest free encyclopedia. It provides an open platform for anyone to participate in editing, creating and disseminating knowledge. In the first week of class, I learned more about Wikipedia and participated in editing. I found that for Wikipedia editors, this is not only a way to share knowledge, but also a unique learning experience.


Interesting points

 

1. Knowledge contribution

When I edit Wikipedia, the greatest pleasure is to contribute knowledge directly. Seeing that the articles I have modified or the content I have added can be used by readers all over the world makes me feel magical and satisfied. When editing Wikipedia, because I have to conduct in-depth research on a certain topic and integrate scattered information into a rigorous article, this process of sorting and summarizing also makes me feel very accomplished.

2. Open democracy

Anyone can edit, modify and improve entries. This model makes the dissemination of knowledge more open and democratic. Every time the edit of Wikipedia is completed and published, you can see your own modification record in the edit record. Not only yourself, but anyone's edits will be publicly recorded, which also reflects the openness of Wikipedia.


Discussion

 

Although the openness of Wikipedia is a major advantage, it also brings some issues that need further discussion. The quality of Wikipedia's content is uneven. Some areas may have more comprehensive information, while other areas lack complete information due to low attention. Moreover, because anyone can edit, the reliability of Wikipedia's information is also under investigation, and biased information or content that is not fully verified may appear. Therefore, how can Wikipedia improve the quality of information while being free and open?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more