Week1.Wikipedia Editor's Summary and Reflection---YANJINJIN(염금금)

  In the past few days, I have edited a Wikipedia entry, focusing on revising the section on the "History of Artificial Intelligence Development." Previous versions were more concise and did not adequately explain the evolution of artificial intelligence from its origins to modern times, lacking detailed descriptions of key technological breakthroughs and representative figures. I added updates on the major technological advancements from the 1960s to the present, including the rapid development of deep learning, natural language processing, and automation systems, and provided a brief introduction to Alan Turing and John McCarthy, among others, to offer readers more comprehensive information.

I have updated the relevant content of this entry and organized the historical development into more structured segments to help readers better understand the evolution of this technology.You can click here to view my edited content and learn more.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence


Mention any new, interesting, or unusual learning content

  During this edit, I delved into many resources outside of Wikipedia, particularly some more academic papers, to ensure that my modifications were accurate and detailed. A particularly interesting discovery is that while early AI research faced numerous challenges, it also led to some unexpected breakthroughs. For example, Alan Turing's "Turing Test" not only influenced the development of computer science but also sparked discussions about the philosophy and ethics of artificial intelligence. I also learned that while the early expectations for artificial intelligence were very high, many ideals were not realized at the time due to hardware limitations and algorithmic bottlenecks. This has given me a deeper understanding of today's achievements in artificial intelligence and prompted me to reflect on the nonlinear characteristics of technological development.

  Furthermore, it is worth noting that ethical issues in the field of artificial intelligence began to receive more attention at the end of the 20th century, particularly discussions related to "black box" problems involving AI decision-making and machine learning algorithms, which were also fully reflected in editing.

Issues, concerns, or discussion angles related to the editor, as well as those who wish to discuss further with me or others

  While editing, I discovered a very important yet highly controversial topic in the field of artificial intelligence—the ethical issues surrounding artificial intelligence. With the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology, the decision-making process of machine learning algorithms has surpassed many human understandings. These algorithms often optimize themselves based on large amounts of data, but without sufficient transparency, this also leads to a "black box problem," where the process and rationale behind their decisions cannot be explained.

  I believe we need to further explore how to balance technological innovation with ethical review. As artificial intelligence is widely applied across various industries, ensuring that its decision-making processes are fair, transparent, and unbiased has become an issue that cannot be ignored. What do you think about that? What measures do you think should be taken in the future to ensure ethical compliance with artificial intelligence?

  I hope we can discuss this complex yet very important topic together!

Comments

  1. hezixuanMarch 15, 2025 at 12:45 AM

    One possible direction for improvement is to further combine specific cases when introducing the "black box problem", such as the use of artificial intelligence in medical diagnosis and other opacity issues, to enhance the realism and persuasiveness of the discussion.

    ReplyDelete
  2. pineappleQMarch 15, 2025 at 9:34 PM

    In my opinion, what is critical and limited is the development of global uniform ethical standards and regulations. Because current AI algorithms are based on global applications. Such as chatgpt, so the international community needs to develop a unified ethical framework and regulations. Laws are needed to enhance data privacy and so on. However, it is very difficult to establish a uniform global law, and each country can first establish relevant laws according to its own national conditions.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more