Week2: Wikipedia and Information Bias —JIA YUAN

1) Summary

This week’s class discussion focused on Wikipedia’s Neutral Point of View (NPOV) policy, which made me think more deeply about the issue of information bias. Wikipedia encourages editors to write content in an objective and neutral manner, avoiding language that reflects personal opinions. However, in practice, achieving complete neutrality is not easy.

For example, editors from different cultural backgrounds may have varying perspectives on the same event, and certain topics (such as politics, history, and social issues) are more likely to be influenced by specific viewpoints. Additionally, since Wikipedia relies on secondary sources for verification, what happens if mainstream media itself has biases? This raises the question of whether Wikipedia can truly maintain absolute neutrality.

2) Interesting Points

One interesting phenomenon is that different language versions of Wikipedia may present the same event in significantly different ways. For instance, a historical event might be described differently in the English Wikipedia and the Chinese Wikipedia. This made me realize that the way information is structured and presented can be influenced by cultural and societal contexts. Even though Wikipedia strives for neutrality, it is difficult to eliminate bias entirely.

Another intriguing aspect is the occurrence of “edit wars,” where editors with differing viewpoints repeatedly modify controversial articles in an attempt to shape the final narrative. Although Wikipedia’s administrators and experienced editors intervene to mediate disputes, this ongoing revision process highlights the complexities of information representation.

3) Future Goals

In the future, I hope to explore Wikipedia’s role in global knowledge dissemination, particularly how it maintains balance across different cultural contexts. I also want to learn how to better identify information biases and develop the skills to write content in a more objective and fair manner.

Additionally, I am interested in comparing articles across different language versions of Wikipedia to analyze their differences in structure, wording, and sources. This would not only help me understand how information flows across cultures but also improve my ability to consider multiple perspectives in research and writing.

4) Discussion

Do you think Wikipedia can truly achieve complete neutrality? How can we improve our ability to recognize information bias when consuming content? Let’s discuss!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more