week4--How to Assess the Reliability of a Work？ --WU WENHAO

WU WENHAO,2021080464 

Summary

 In an age of information overload, evaluating the reliability of a work is essential. Reliability doesn’t depend solely on accuracy—it also involves the type of work, the author, the publisher, and the publication date. For instance, academic articles are typically more trustworthy than blog posts or social media content because they go through peer review. Likewise, works written by well-known scholars or authoritative institutions tend to be more reliable than anonymous or self-published sources without editorial oversight. The publication date also matters, as older sources may be outdated or reflect historical biases.

 Interesting Discovery

  Many people mistakenly assume that "information in published books must be reliable," but that's not always the case. For example, the best-selling book Rich Dad, Poor Dad is published by a commercial publisher and claims to teach readers how to become wealthy. However, it’s not based on rigorous economic research but rather on the author’s personal experiences, many of which are unverifiable. Although the book achieved great commercial success, it hasn't been recognized by the academic community. This shows that even widely published and popular books may not provide reliable information. Therefore, when evaluating a source, we should look beyond the publisher and examine whether the content is scientifically grounded, peer-reviewed, and supported by data.

Discussion Questions

  Are self-published works completely untrustworthy, or can they still offer value in certain contexts? Furthermore, how can we teach students in schools to assess the reliability of information, so they can make informed choices across diverse sources? This is not only an academic issue but also a vital digital literacy skill for everyday life.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more