WEEK4: read Chapter 4 The Puzzle of Openness --LAOXINYI

 1）Summary

In Chapter 4, the authors explore the concept of “openness” in Wikipedia and other open content communities. While Wikipedia proudly claims to be a “free encyclopedia that anyone can edit,” the reality is more complicated. The paper outlines how openness, inspired by the Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) movement, presents its own challenges, especially when dealing with problematic users such as trolls, vandals, and disruptive individuals. While openness is essential to the collaborative nature of Wikipedia, it often conflicts with the need for structure and quality control, sparking debate about how to balance these two values. The chapter discusses aspects such as transparency, integrity, non-discrimination, and non-interference, all of which are essential to open content communities. However, there are difficult trade-offs, especially when it comes to maintaining content quality and managing controversy or censorship.


2）Interesting Point

Tension between openness and quality: A particularly interesting point is that Wikipedia’s philosophy of openness is often tested by the need to prevent vandalism and ensure high-quality contributions. For example, when the system began to allow for more technical features, such as blocking users based on IP addresses to curb vandalism, it led to a loss of some of the ideal “open” environment that Wikipedia originally promised.

The "WikiChix" controversy: the creation of a women-only space within the wider open Wikipedia community WikiChix was a surprise. The group was created to address gender bias and provide a space for women to discuss topics in a male-dominated space. The controversy surrounding its creation and its exclusion of men revealed the conflict between openness and the desire for a safe, supportive space within a community that values ​​inclusivity. 


3）Discussion

Do you think this reduction in openness will ultimately limit the diversity of contributions, or will it preserve the integrity of the content?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more