week6: read Chapter 8 --LAOXINYI

 1）Summary

Chapter 8 concludes the book by reflecting on the broader implications of Wikipedia’s success and the challenges it faces as it continues to grow. The author uses the metaphor of a jigsaw puzzle to explain how Wikipedia’s collaborative culture—underpinned by neutrality and integrity—helps build the encyclopedia’s collective knowledge. The metaphor emphasizes that while the individual pieces (contributions) may not always fit perfectly or harmoniously, the effort to piece them together creates something valuable.


The chapter discusses how Wikipedia’s success is not simply due to technology (the “wiki” format) but to the collaborative culture that drives it. The author agrees with Larry Sanger, one of the co-founders of Wikipedia, who acknowledges that successful collaborative systems require a strong culture of shared values, such as integrity, not just the software itself. This culture of “integrity” fosters collaboration and patience, which is essential for resolving conflicts within the community.


However, the chapter also recognizes the tensions inherent in open content communities. Despite its collaborative and open nature, Wikipedia is not immune to human imperfections, such as pettiness, conflict, and name-calling. The author invokes Godwin’s Law to emphasize the “us versus them” mentality that can emerge in online communities and how this mentality can sometimes undermine the collaborative process. Despite these problems, an emphasis on goodwill and fostering collaboration can help mitigate these challenges.


A key takeaway from this chapter is that Wikipedia, while committed to creating a universal encyclopedia, is far from perfect. The community faces growing pains, and there are concerns about its future, particularly its growing bureaucracy and the possibility of decline. Despite this, the authors express optimism, noting that even if Wikipedia “forks” (splits into multiple versions) or ceases to exist, the ideas and community behind it may live on in other projects.


Finally, the authors view Wikipedia’s achievements as a “happy accident,” and express the belief that Wikipedia has come closest to achieving the vision of a universal encyclopedia, even if its path has been imperfect and full of surprises.


2）Interesting Point

In this chapter, I learned new and interesting things:

- Collaboration and integrity: Collaboration driven by shared norms is important even in the face of conflict.

- Technology and culture: Wikipedia’s success is not due to technology alone (such as the wiki format)—it’s culture that fosters collaboration.

- Human nature and utopian ideals: Acknowledging that while Wikipedia aims to be a utopian resource, it is still shaped by human nature, including the potential for conflict, disagreement, and abuse.

- Leadership and governance: Balancing the need for open content with the need for leadership or authority to deal with conflict and malicious actors.

- The future of Wikipedia: Speculations about how Wikipedia will continue to evolve, challenges it faces, and possible “forks” or splits into new projects.

3）Discussion

As Wikipedia gets bigger, is there likely to be some degree of concentration of power, such as "authority" issues with administrators and other leadership roles? Would this concentration affect the openness and inclusiveness of Wikipedia?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more