Week 9 - Review about the readings for the next week.(Book Chapter 9) - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

1. Summarize in my your own words of materials that I read

In his work, Reagle adopts a citation style that diverges somewhat from conventional academic practices, particularly influenced by his extensive use of sources like Wikipedia and other online materials. Instead of employing detailed formal citations for every instance, he frequently utilizes simplified attributions, often referencing sources merely as "Wikipedia." He makes a conscious effort to retain any grammatical inaccuracies present in the original web content, intervening only minimally for necessary corrections. A key aspect of his approach is prioritizing stable or permanent links, recognizing the inherently dynamic nature of online information, especially wikis. For the print version, he keeps direct URLs to a minimum, guiding readers to consult the online hypertext edition for more comprehensive references. He also acknowledges potential variations in page numbering between the print and digital formats. Ultimately, Reagle's citation system represents a thoughtful balance, aiming to uphold academic rigor while pragmatically addressing the challenges of citing continually evolving, web-based knowledge sources.

2. Mention of any new, interesting, or unusual items that I learned through lecture.

After reading Chapter 9 of Good Faith Collaboration, I found myself reflecting on how Reagle adapts citation practices to suit the ever-changing, collaborative environment of platforms like Wikipedia. By simplifying attributions and focusing on stable links, I realized just how challenging it can be to reference digital content that is constantly evolving. This made me question how academic standards and our understanding of credibility need to change in a world where knowledge is produced collectively online.

I was also struck by Reagle’s decision to preserve original errors and to acknowledge the differences between print and digital editions. This transparent and practical approach to scholarship made me think about how the fluid nature of digital information is reshaping traditional academic conventions, and how we document and trust knowledge in today’s media landscape.

3. Identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more.

1. How should academic citation standards evolve to address the challenges of referencing dynamic and collaboratively edited online sources like Wikipedia.

Answer. Academic citation standards should become more flexible and incorporate practices like using stable links and version histories, because this ensures that references remain verifiable even as online content changes

2. What are the potential benefits and drawbacks of preserving original errors from sources in academic writing?

Answer. Preserving original errors can increase transparency and authenticity in scholarship, but it may also risk undermining the perceived credibility of the work.

3. In what ways does the fluidity of digital information challenge traditional notions of credibility and trust in scholarly work?

Answer. The fluidity of digital information challenges traditional credibility by making it harder to verify and stabilize sources, which requires scholars to develop new strategies for evaluating and documenting knowledge.