Week 9 Wikipedia Editing Report—BAI SHIQI

During Week 9, I focused on editing and improving three Wikipedia articles: Civil Society, Cognitive Warfare, and Xi Jinping’s Anti-Corruption Campaign. This week’s work helped me better understand how to present complex and sometimes sensitive topics in a clear, neutral, and informative way.

1. Civil Society

I added content related to the current state of civil society in China, especially how it functions under institutional constraints. I also included discussion on the role of digital platforms in promoting civic engagement. To ensure the article was well-rounded, I drew on recent academic studies and made sure to standardize key terms for consistency and clarity. The goal was to reflect the nuances of civil society in non-Western contexts without introducing bias.

2. Cognitive Warfare

This is a relatively new and evolving concept in military and media studies. I expanded the article by explaining how cognitive warfare differs from information warfare and psychological operations. I also incorporated references to how organizations like NATO and the U.S. military define and apply this strategy. What stood out to me was how social media has become a major battlefield for shaping public perception—something that raises serious questions about truth, trust, and control in the digital age.

3. Xi Jinping’s Anti-Corruption Campaign

In this entry, I updated information on recent developments, including notable cases involving local officials and state-owned enterprise executives. I also added academic perspectives on the political impact of the campaign, such as power centralization and institutional reform. I tried to strike a balance between documenting key facts and acknowledging different interpretations of the campaign’s motives and outcomes.

Reflections and Takeaways:

This week’s editing experience taught me the importance of neutral tone and verifiable sources—especially when working on politically sensitive topics. For example, writing about the anti-corruption campaign required careful wording to avoid making assumptions or sounding one-sided. At the same time, editing the article on cognitive warfare made me realize how fast new ideas can emerge and gain relevance in today’s information landscape. Overall, contributing to Wikipedia this week felt like a way of engaging with public knowledge, not just consuming it.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more