week11: read Commons:FAQ --LAOXINYI

 1）Summary

Have you ever had a headache finding suitable and legal images when writing papers, making PPTs, or preparing teaching materials? I used to encounter this dilemma frequently until I discovered Wikimedia Commons, a treasure trove of images, audio, and videos that can be downloaded, used, and even modified for free.

It was established in 2004 by the Wikimedia Foundation (the organization that runs Wikipedia), with the core concept of "free sharing": you can upload your own work or use content uploaded by others, provided that you comply with the corresponding licensing terms. Now, it has collected hundreds of millions of images, audio, and video files, covering science, art, history, geography, and other aspects. Basically, you can find something you want to find.


2）Interesting Point

What surprised me the most was that the threshold for uploading was actually very low. Although it is not as "fool-proof" as some social networking sites, as long as the photos you took yourself or the works you have clear authorization for, even if it is a photo of a flower, a sunset, or the cover of an old book, you can upload it.

Moreover, the uploader can also choose a suitable authorization method, such as CC BY (Attribution) or CC BY-SA (Attribution + Share Alike). This made me realize that every ordinary person actually has the opportunity to make a contribution to the world's shared knowledge, even if it is just a picture or a piece of audio, maybe it will be cited by a student, researcher, or designer in the future.

3）Discussion

How to ensure the authenticity and originality of uploaded content?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more