Week7 -- Class Discussion-CHEN SIYU(진사우)

 Summary:

As digital technology evolves, the ways we access and interact with knowledge have expanded rapidly. Among the most popular platforms today are AI-powered assistants (like ChatGPT) and Wikipedia. Both serve as go-to resources for students, professionals, and everyday learners alike, but they play very different roles in the knowledge ecosystem.

AI tools are designed for fast, user-friendly interactions that adapt to your needs. Meanwhile, Wikipedia provides well-organized, community-edited content backed by sources. Instead of replacing one another, they’ve become tools people use side by side, depending on the kind of information they’re looking for.

Key Insights：

One of AI’s biggest strengths is its ability to make complex ideas simple. It can break down unfamiliar concepts, explain step-by-step processes, or even help brainstorm ideas — all in a conversational, personalized way.


Wikipedia for Depth and Trust:

Wikipedia stands out for its neutral tone, verifiable references, and thorough coverage of topics. Its structured format and open-editing system make it especially valuable when you need accurate facts, dates, names, or sources for academic work.


Better Together:

Rather than choosing between them, many users start with AI to get a quick overview or form a question, then move to Wikipedia to fact-check, expand their knowledge, or find primary sources.


Reflection and Discussion：

The question today isn’t “Which one is better?” — it’s “How do we use both effectively?”

We’re no longer just looking for information; we’re learning how to manage and evaluate it. Knowing when to ask an AI and when to consult Wikipedia is becoming a modern literacy skill in itself.


Looking ahead, it’s easy to imagine a future tool that combines the fluidity and interactivity of AI with the transparency and credibility of Wikipedia — a hybrid platform that delivers both speed and trust in one place.


So maybe the real evolution isn’t in the tools themselves, but in how we think about knowledge: not just how to find it, but how to question, verify, and apply it. 





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more