Week8 Wikipedia Edit-CHEN SIWEN 진사문

 Summary:

Wikipedia requires articles to be based on reliable, published sources, following the Verifiability principle. All material that is challenged or likely to be challenged needs inline citations. The platform emphasizes co-construction and co-management with mechanisms like content review and editing history. "Published" refers to any source made public, and the reliability of sources depends on context, engagement in fact-checking, and usage in reputable outlets.

Interesting Points:

Wikipedia prefers secondary sources and emphasizes the importance of authoritative citations, while isolated studies and primary sources require caution. The reliability of a source is determined by its relevance to the topic and how it’s used in reputable outlets. Older sources can become outdated, and Wikipedia encourages using newer sources, though very new ones may need further validation. Reputable news outlets are considered reliable, but press releases and human interest stories are less reliable. Editors must avoid circular sourcing.

Discussion:

Wikipedia’s guidelines ensure accuracy, but challenges arise with outdated or conflicting sources. The platform’s reliance on verifiable sources limits the inclusion of certain viewpoints. As fields evolve, could the use of secondary sources limit the discussion of certain topics? The co-management approach ensures accuracy but requires constant source verification. While AI may help identify reliable sources, human judgment remains essential for understanding nuance and context.

Comments

  1. YU JIEApril 26, 2025 at 8:34 AM

    Wikipedia relies on verifiable secondary sources to ensure the accuracy of its content, but this can also make it difficult to fully present emerging fields or controversial topics. As disciplines continue to evolve, traditional sources may struggle to timely reflect the latest perspectives, limiting the breadth of the discussion. Although artificial intelligence can help filter and recommend more reliable data, it struggles to fully replace human judgment in understanding context and nuances. Therefore, Wikipedia still relies on manual editing to continuously verify and update its content, thereby maintaining the authority and timeliness of its information.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more