Week9--Wikipedia editing entry--진사우 (CHEN SIYU)

 Summary:

The entries note that coffee cultures around the world develop regional characteristics due to differences in drinking methods, social habits, and service approaches:


In Italy, quick coffee consumption (such as espresso) is closely tied to traditional rhythms.

In the United States, coffee is often a carry-on beverage.

Nordic countries have high consumption and tend to drink slowly and communicate at home or in the workplace.

Some Asian countries have developed themed cafes and handcrafted specialty coffees.



Interesting points: 

Finns consume over 12 kilograms of coffee annually, but the types are simple, emphasizing "sharing time" over flavor variations.

In Japan, the "slow coffee culture" influenced by traditional tea ceremony has fostered the development of refined hand-punching and utensil aesthetics.

Korean cafes often serve as "photo-check-in" venues, with spatial design focusing on visual effects rather than just coffee 


Discussion:

Is there a direct relationship between coffee culture and the country's pace (fast vs. slow living)?

How can Asian cultures localize foreign beverages, thereby reversing the impact on global coffee culture?

Is coffee culture gradually becoming a "social media-driven" trend?





Comments

  1. CHEN SIWENMay 3, 2025 at 10:29 PM

    Yes, coffee culture is gradually becoming a social media-driven trend. Platforms like Instagram and TikTok have turned coffee into more than just a beverage—it’s now a symbol of lifestyle and aesthetics. People love sharing photos of beautifully crafted drinks and visiting trendy cafés for the “Instagrammable” experience. This shift emphasizes visual appeal and social value, though it can sometimes overshadow the appreciation of coffee’s actual quality and cultural depth.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more