W12.2-ZHONG QI-Understanding Wikipedia: Images and other media

 1. Summary of Reading Materials

This week"s content outlines the progression of Wikipedia entries from initial drafts to refined articles, underscoring critical elements including content caliber, organizational framework, citation standards, impartiality, and collaborative editing. The video elaborates on the transformation from "stub articles" to "featured articles," highlighting collective efforts among contributors, adherence to neutrality and credible references, alongside iterative proofreading and evaluation processes. The textual analysis delineates five evolutionary phases of article development: nascent, foundational, intermediate, advanced, and final stages—each corresponding to incremental content enrichment, stylistic refinement, and verification procedures.


2. Notable Insights

What particularly resonated with me was the video"s emphasis on the editorial principle "collective agreement supersedes individual authority." Even subject matter experts must align their modifications with Wikipedia"s content policies through collaborative consensus-building—a practice not without its uniqueness in conventional author-centric writing contexts. Additionally, the demonstration of tracking article revision histories and identifying pivotal contributors enhanced my appreciation for Wikipedia"s transparency protocols and intricate editorial networks.


3. Challenges and Discussion Points

While the article development framework appears systematic, practical implementation often encounters stagnation at intermediate phases due to editorial disputes or insufficient active contributors. Furthermore, the video"s portrayal of "high-caliber content" predominantly relies on academic citations, raising questions about balancing verifiability and contemporary relevance for emerging subjects (e.g., digital culture) with limited scholarly documentation. Potential classroom discussions could explore: Does Wikipedia inadequately recognize the epistemological value of new media or non-traditional knowledge repositories?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more