Week 10. The Sociology of Remix Culture- ZHONG QI

The second part of the lecture "Topics in Sociology: Internet" looks at how digital platforms change how people interact. The clearest example is remix culture. Whether it’s sampling music, making memes, editing fan videos, or creating stories together, remix culture shows three ways the Internet works: letting more people create, blurring the line between creators and audiences, and changing old ideas about who "owns" creative work.

Letting Everyone Create

Before the Internet, making creative work often required expensive tools, approval from industry experts, and official publishing channels. Now, anyone with a smartphone and free software can edit videos, mix sounds, or combine images. The lecture mentioned platforms like YouTube and TikTok, where users often remake copyrighted content under "fair use" rules or platform guidelines. This lets fans become co-creators and builds communities around shared interests.

Breaking the Single-Author Idea

Research shows remix culture challenges the idea of one person owning a creation. In remix spaces, works grow through many people adding ideas, not just one original creator. The Wikipedia article on remix culture says things like "sampling" and "mashups" create new forms of expression that depend on groups. Instead of seeing culture as fixed, remixers treat it like a living resource that improves through reinterpretation and dialogue.

As the lecture said: "Every remix talks to the original work and to the larger community of remixes"—showing creativity isn’t just individual but social.

Power and Access

While remix culture seems open, sociology reminds us not all creators have the same tools or visibility. Platform algorithms often favor popular styles or voices, keeping old power structures alive. Laws also differ worldwide—what’s "fair use" in one country might be illegal elsewhere. The fight between grassroots creativity and corporate/legal rules decides which remixes succeed and which stay hidden.

From Fans to Movements

Remix culture isn’t just for fun—it can drive social change. Activists reuse slogans, images, and protest videos to tell powerful stories online. Memes become protest symbols; edited videos link current events to past struggles. The lecture showed examples where remixes drew public attention and organized action, proving the format works for both play and serious causes.

Conclusion

Remix culture helps us understand Internet sociology: creativity as dialogue, audiences as partners, and culture as a shared resource that keeps changing. As we keep studying and joining these practices, we must see both the opportunities for empowerment and the unfair systems that decide who gets to remix, how, and with what impact. The big question isn’t whether remix culture will survive—it’s how we can support its democratic goals while fixing its problems.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more