Week 11 - Fatima Paulina Lopez Diaz

 How Editing Wikipedia Helps Strengthen Community Knowledge


By editing Wikipedia, we are not just fixing typos or adding citations; we are contributing to a global effort to build and refine our shared understanding of the world.

Wikipedia is a collaborative platform that constantly evolves. It reflects not only what we know, but how we prioritize and interpret that knowledge. When you edit an article—whether to correct a mistake, expand on a topic, or add reliable sources—we’re helping to ensure the information is current, trustworthy, and accessible to all. Every small improvement strengthens the overall integrity of the encyclopedia.

One of the most powerful aspects of editing this platform is the ability to highlight knowledge that often goes overlooked. Many communities and cultures are underrepresented online, especially in major languages. By writing about local history, notable individuals, regional science, or indigenous knowledge, editors can bring visibility to important topics that might otherwise be ignored. This democratizes information and ensures that global knowledge isn’t filtered through a narrow lens.

Also,  contributors often find themselves diving into academic articles, fact-checking sources, and improving their writing clarity. It’s a fantastic way to sharpen research and critical thinking skills, which benefits not only the individual but also the wider educational ecosystem. When more people understand how information is created and validated, communities become more resistant to misinformation and disinformation.

Perhaps the most rewarding aspect of editing Wikipedia is knowing that your contributions can reach thousands of readers around the world. Whether you’re updating a local landmark’s page or writing about a newly discovered species, your work has the potential to educate and inform.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more