Week 9 - Review about the article “Wikipedia in Culture”-CHEN SIWEN 진사문

1. Summarize in your own words the materials that you read

The article "Wikipedia in Culture" discusses how Wikipedia has moved far beyond its original role as an online encyclopedia and become a cultural symbol. It is referenced, parodied, and even physically honored across various forms of media—such as music videos, comedy shows, novels, statues, and memes. These references range from humorous vandalism to thoughtful artistic tributes, showing how Wikipedia both reflects and influences the digital culture of our time.

2. Mention any new, interesting, or unusual items that you learned through the lecture

One surprising thing I learned was that there is an actual statue called the Wikipedia Monument in Poland, dedicated to its contributors. That a website could inspire public art really shows its cultural importance. Another unexpected detail was that Wikipedia was used as a joke structure in a viral war meme, formatted like a serious historical article. These examples made me realize that Wikipedia isn’t just a source of facts, but also a source of creativity and humor.

 3. Identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more

A concern that stood out to me is how Wikipedia’s open model might unintentionally favor certain demographics—especially English-speaking, internet-savvy users—which could lead to systemic bias in how knowledge is presented. The article touches on Wikipedia's cultural reach, but I think it could go deeper in questioning what values or worldviews are being spread through these cultural representations.

Questions:

1. How can Wikipedia communities work to make editing and content creation more accessible to underrepresented voices?

2. As Wikipedia continues to appear in popular culture, what does this say about our changing relationship with knowledge and authority?


Comments

  1. YU JIEMay 4, 2025 at 6:05 AM

    1. How can Wikipedia communities work to make editing and content creation more accessible to underrepresented voices?
    Wikipedia can lower participation barriers through multilingual support, editing training, and user-friendly tools.
    Promoting the involvement of diverse editors helps build a more inclusive and comprehensive knowledge system.

    2. As Wikipedia continues to appear in popular culture, what does this say about our changing relationship with knowledge and authority?
    The popularity of Wikipedia indicates that the general public is increasingly accepting open collaborative approaches to knowledge production.
    This change also reflects higher public expectations for the authenticity of information and diverse perspectives.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more