Week10----What is Remix culture?-CHEN SIWEN 진사문

summary

Remix Culture is a cultural phenomenon that is re-created based on existing cultural content. It encourages individuals or groups to recombine existing works - such as music, videos, text, images, etc. - through editing, collage, adaptation and other means to create new forms of expression. This culture is especially popular in the Internet era. The core concept behind it is "read-write culture", which is the opposite of the traditional "read-only culture".

Remix culture is not only a creative behavior, but also a way of cultural participation. Its development is inseparable from digital technology, especially in YouTube, TikTok, Instagram and other platforms, which has become an important mode for content dissemination and user participation. At the same time, this culture has also sparked widespread controversy about copyright, originality and legality.

Interesting points

Many short videos we see on TikTok, TikTok, Kuaishou and other platforms every day can basically be regarded as the performance of Remix. For example, users create completely different entertainment effects by imitating popular dances, recreating movie clips with funny dubbing, or mixing some classic audio and video. This creative method not only allows ordinary people to become creators, but also gives them new life and meaning through the re-creation of existing content, forming an interactive and highly participatory online cultural phenomenon.

Discussion

Does Remix culture bring us creative freedom, or does it infringe on the copyright of the original work? Does it mean that we have changed from "audience" to "creator"? If everyone can adapt the work at will, can we still retain the originality? For creators, is it necessary to set stricter boundaries for their works to protect the fruits of their labor? For consumers or secondary creators, should we have more copyright awareness and understand the subtle boundaries between Remix and plagiarism?

Shouldn't we consider establishing a legal and ethical system that can both respect originality and tolerate re-creation in the future? Can Remix culture itself lead us into a new era of more open and inclusive creation?

Comments

  1. ZHONG QIMay 11, 2025 at 8:32 AM

    You explained Remix Culture in a clear and engaging way, and I liked how you connected it to platforms we use every day like TikTok. The questions you raised at the end were super thought-provoking. Maybe next time you could add some real-life examples or cases to make it even more relatable.

    ReplyDelete
  2. YU JIEMay 16, 2025 at 3:48 AM

    Remix culture transforms the masses from "viewers" to "creators," bringing creative freedom and cultural diversity, but also raising concerns about originality and copyright. To protect the rights of original authors while encouraging re-creation, we need to establish a legal and ethical framework that balances originality and adaptation. As long as Remix culture respects copyright and defines clear boundaries, it has the potential to lead us into a new era of more open and inclusive creation.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more