Week10 - What is remix culture? (Park chaebin 박채빈)

I read the "Remix culture" Wikipedia article. 


1. Summary

Remix culture is a culture in which new content is created based on existing works. It has become more active with the development of digital technology. Based on this transformation, Professor Lawrence Lessig explained that society has shifted from a "Read-Only" culture to a "Read/Write" culture. Digital technology has broken the limitations of the analog era, blurring the lines between creators and consumers, and creating an environment where anyone can participate in the creative process. Furthermore, a participatory culture has emerged where people can share and collaboratively build upon creative works.




2. Interesting Points

Remix culture appears across various fields such as music, film, literature, and software. For instance, fan fiction is a creative expression that uses existing characters or settings to craft entirely new stories. This idea is closely related to the concept of OSMU (One Source Multi Use). A good example would be media content like Moving, which reinterprets and adapts an original work into new formats such as films or TV dramas.


One of the main drawbacks of remix culture is the potential for legal disputes. While it expands creative freedom, it also raises serious concerns about copyright infringement. This is especially true in the music industry, where issues related to sampling and plagiarism are frequently debated. Finding a balance between creative freedom and copyright protection is essential.




3. Discussion

1) Balancing Creativity and Copyright: Remix culture expands creative freedom but also increases the risk of copyright infringement. How can we respect the rights of both original creators and those who build upon their work?


2) Application in Education: In what ways can remix culture be used in educational settings? Can students develop the ability to creatively repurpose existing materials through this approach?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more