Week11-ZHONG QI-The Intersection of Participatory Culture and Wiki Collaboration

1) Summary of Materials  

This week’s learning focused on two parts. First, chapters 3-5 of Henry Jenkins’ *Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide* explain how "participatory culture" turns fans from passive audiences into active creators. Jenkins uses examples to show how fans work together, discuss ideas, and change mainstream stories. He emphasizes community, group knowledge, and easy ways to create content. Second, two LMS videos taught us how to submit articles to Wikipedia’s "Did You Know" section following format rules, and explained technical assignment requirements, including accessibility design guidelines.  


2) Interesting Learning Points  

Jenkins’ idea of "weak-tie networks" stood out to me: even with loose connections, fan groups share information very efficiently, much like Wikipedia’s editing system. The "Did You Know" video taught me that a good summary needs both accuracy and a "hook" to grab attention in one sentence – showing the art of information design. I was surprised by the strict accessibility rules in the technical assignment, like image alt-text and page readability, reminding creators to consider all users’ needs.  


3) Questions and Discussion Topics  

Jenkins praises participatory culture but doesn’t fully discuss how companies control creative spaces. When platforms delete fan content, is participation still truly free? Also, does Wikipedia’s "Did You Know" voting system favor popular topics over niche ones? Should high-quality articles about less-known subjects still get recognition? From participatory culture to wiki editing, we need to discuss: How do we balance creative freedom with platform rules? How do we respect both user experience and editor independence? These questions deserve deeper classroom discussion.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more