Week7-Class Discussion-YUJIE 여결

Summary

Wikipedia, as a global open knowledge platform, has long relied on volunteers to jointly edit content, demonstrating the power of collaboration and transparency. Now, artificial intelligence is gradually becoming involved in editing, from language polishing to automatically generating entries, significantly enhancing efficiency. However, improvements in efficiency also pose deep challenges to power distribution, accountability, and transparency mechanisms.

Artificial intelligence is not truly neutral; the algorithms and data it relies on reflect developers' choices and biases. Once AI generates large-scale content, it will be difficult for us to track its criteria and sources, potentially undermining Wikipedia's diversity and credibility. At the same time, the lack of accountability mechanisms when AI makes mistakes also exacerbates ethical risks.

Despite this, AI has advantages in handling tedious tasks and updating obscure content. The key lies in how to set boundaries so that they become auxiliary tools rather than dominant ones. Whether Wikipedia should rely on AI is not just a technical issue, but also a value choice about how knowledge should be generated and shared.


Interesting points

Artificial intelligence has actually been playing a role on Wikipedia for a long time, performing technical editing tasks such as repairing links and standardizing formats through robotic accounts. These tasks are set by humans to ensure that operations are limited and controllable. AI excels at handling repetitive, tedious, but necessary tasks, significantly reducing the burden on volunteers in this regard. However, as AI further intervenes in content generation, it no longer faces efficiency issues but challenges to authenticity, understanding, and neutrality. Language models can write text like encyclopedic entries, but they do not truly understand what is being written. While the generated information flows smoothly, it may conceal errors or even biases.

The core value of Wikipedia lies not in speed, but in openness and collaboration, fostering the exchange of diverse perspectives and the establishment of consensus. If AI were to replace humans for large-scale content creation, this process might be compressed or even eliminated, and we might gain more information but lose the public discussion space to build knowledge.


Discussion

If artificial intelligence starts dominating Wikipedia editing, what would you do?

Comments

  1. LookatmiWikiMay 2, 2025 at 6:57 PM

    Your reflection is really insightful! I agree that while AI can help with repetitive tasks, letting it dominate Wikipedia editing could risk losing the community-driven spirit that makes Wikipedia special. It’s important to keep the human touch in knowledge building.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more