Week9(extra credit)-Whyte’s book The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces-YUJIE 여결

I read Chapters 6 to 11 of "The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces" and its appendix, and overall, I found the book very interesting. I think this is a good book for social science students in the 2020s. Whyte offers numerous insights into spatial design, social interactions, and human needs through meticulous observations of people's behavior in urban public spaces, which remain highly inspiring for today's urban development and planning.

Summary

I read Chapters 6 to 11 of "The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces" and its appendices. This section primarily focuses on people's genuine behaviors in urban public spaces, such as where they like to sit, how they interact with others, and what space designs can attract people to stay. Whyte conducts research through practical observations, presenting conclusions using extensive video materials and data records rather than relying on abstract theoretical analysis. This approach, grounded in real life, makes discussions about urban spaces more concrete and vivid, and aligns more closely with our everyday experiences.

In these chapters, Whyte also provides a detailed analysis of the usage of small squares, pedestrian streets, and areas in front of buildings. He argues that the most crucial factor in determining whether a space is successful is whether anyone is willing to use it. People's choices, behavioral patterns, and interaction methods are important criteria for measuring the quality of urban spaces. This observational research approach not only makes urban planning more humane but also provides a clear perspective on the relationship between people and space.

Interesting points

Interestingly, Whyte observed some seemingly trivial yet very real details. He found that people tend to prefer sitting on steps rather than choosing specially designed benches, even if the chairs appear more comfortable. Moreover, people also prefer to gather in places with sunlight, tree shade, or dining cars, as these seemingly random choices actually reveal a natural preference for urban spaces. This observation does not rely on complex theories but reveals the true relationship between people and space in cities through extensive and detailed records.

For me, these findings not only make urban design more humane but also prompt me to reconsider my stay options in the city. In the past, I might not have cared why I preferred sitting in a corner or why I was always drawn to a small square, but now I am more focused on the spatial arrangements and atmosphere behind them. Whyte's research has shown me that a good urban space is not about how beautiful it appears, but about whether it truly makes people want to stay.

Discussion

In the ongoing pursuit of efficiency and modernization in cities, have we gradually overlooked people's genuine needs and feelings for space in their daily lives?