Extra Credit - Fatima Paulina Lopez Diaz

 

How Editing Wikipedia Helped Me Become Better at Writing

If you want to get better at writing about science, there’s one tool you might not think of right away: editing Wikipedia.

Editing Wikipedia is not just about fixing mistakes. It’s a great way to practice writing clearly, fairly, and with good sources — all important parts of good scientific writing. Whether you’re a student, a scientist, or just someone who enjoys science, working on Wikipedia can help you build your writing skills.

Good scientific writing is about explaining big ideas in a way that people can understand. Many scientists write only for other experts. But when you write on Wikipedia, your audience is much wider: students, teachers, journalists, and everyday readers.

This helps you practice writing simply and clearly. Can someone who isn’t a scientist understand what you wrote? Can you avoid using too much technical language? Writing for Wikipedia teaches you how to explain science well — a skill that helps in research papers, reports, and even job applications.

Good scientific writing should be based on facts, not personal opinions. Wikipedia follows the same rule. It has a key policy called Neutral Point of View (NPOV), which means everything you write should be fair and balanced.

When you edit Wikipedia, you practice writing about facts without taking sides. You also learn to explain when experts disagree about a topic. This is an important skill when writing reviews, reports, or discussions in scientific papers.

In science, it’s very important to support your statements with strong, trustworthy sources. Wikipedia teaches you to do this too. Everything you write must be backed up with reliable references, like scientific papers or books.

By editing Wikipedia, you practice finding good sources, reading scientific studies, and choosing which ones to use. These skills will help you when you write your own scientific papers or presentations.

One of the best ways to improve your writing is to get feedback. Wikipedia has a large community of editors. When you make changes, other people may review your edits, offer suggestions, or point out mistakes.

This feedback helps you learn. You’ll see how others read your writing and how to make it clearer. Over time, this will make you a stronger writer — in both Wikipedia and your scientific work.

Editing Wikipedia also teaches you to be careful and precise. Articles must follow clear rules for tone, structure, citations, and style. This helps you build good writing habits.

You’ll also learn to double-check facts and wording. In science, being accurate matters a lot. Practicing this attention to detail on Wikipedia will make you more careful in your research writing too.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more