WEEK 13-Wikipedia Edit WU JIACHEN

 

1. Overview

here is my work

This week, I focused on translating the Wikipedia article about Freedom of Information. As a fundamental pillar of modern democratic societies, Freedom of Information (FOI) refers to the public’s right to access government-held information and the transparency mechanisms that support it. The article provides a comprehensive overview of the historical development of FOI, relevant legal frameworks, real-world implementations across different countries, and the challenges faced. Through this translation, I gained a solid understanding of FOI’s core concepts and evolution, as well as the crucial role it plays in promoting government transparency, combating corruption, and encouraging citizen participation. This task also helped me improve my ability to convey complex legal and policy information clearly.

2. Interesting Points

One of the most interesting aspects I discovered during translation was the diversity in how different countries implement FOI laws. While many countries have enacted FOI legislation, the effectiveness and ease of use vary widely. Some nations have comprehensive laws on paper but face bureaucratic hurdles or technological limitations that hinder actual access to information. The article highlights notable examples like the United States’ Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and India’s Right to Information Act (RTI), showing different models of government transparency and public oversight. Additionally, with the rise of the digital age, the scope of FOI is expanding to include electronic data and internet-based information, which brings new legal and privacy challenges that the article discusses.

3. Questions Raised

After completing the translation, several questions came to mind for further reflection. First, how do FOI laws balance government transparency with national security and individual privacy concerns in practice? Second, in the digital information era, how can FOI be protected while preventing misuse of information and the spread of misinformation? Lastly, since public awareness and demand for FOI vary across countries, how can global consensus and coordination be fostered to advance the right to information worldwide? These questions not only relate to legal frameworks but also touch on broader issues of democratic development and technology governance.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more