WEEK 16-Wikipedia Edit WU JIACHEN

 

1. Overview

This week, I completed two Wikipedia translation tasks covering two seemingly unrelated but meaningful topics: FlexiRide and Mercy in religious contexts. Both reflect how human society strives to improve quality of life through technological innovation and spiritual values. FlexiRide is a modern transportation model based on real-time demand and social networks. It dynamically matches riders with drivers to alleviate traffic congestion, reduce environmental pollution, and strengthen community connections. Compared to traditional fixed-route carpooling, FlexiRide offers greater convenience and efficiency, representing a new wave of shared economy in urban mobility.

On the other hand, Mercy is a core ethical concept in many religions such as Buddhism, Christianity, and Islam. It emphasizes caring for others and alleviating suffering—not only as an emotional response but as a guiding principle for action. Mercy motivates followers to practice forgiveness, help the vulnerable, and engage in acts of kindness. Translating these two entries helped me gain knowledge about cutting-edge technological solutions in transportation as well as the universal human values rooted in religious teachings.

2. Interesting Points

I found FlexiRide particularly fascinating because it combines mobile internet, big data, and instant communication to enable dynamic matching between passengers and drivers. This model significantly improves vehicle utilization, reduces empty trips, lowers travel costs, and decreases carbon emissions, making it socially and environmentally valuable. Additionally, FlexiRide fosters trust and interaction within communities, boosting the shared economy’s growth. I also learned that its implementation varies greatly by country and city, depending on local transportation needs and technological infrastructure, highlighting the deep integration of technology and social context.

Regarding Mercy, what struck me most was how its expression differs across religions but shares the same core of love and care. Buddhism emphasizes Mercy through meditation and enlightenment to cultivate inner peace and empathy; Christianity stresses unconditional love and forgiveness, encouraging acts of kindness towards neighbors; Islam extends Mercy not only to humans but also to nature and the universe. Religious texts and practices around Mercy shape believers’ values and have profound social ethical implications. I was especially moved by religious movements that use Mercy to promote social justice and peace.

3. Questions Raised

These translations also sparked several deep questions. First, what are the biggest technical and social challenges facing FlexiRide? How can user safety and privacy be ensured? How can trust between drivers and passengers be built and maintained? With the rise of autonomous vehicles and AI, how might this transportation model evolve? Furthermore, how can FlexiRide be effectively promoted in diverse cultural and policy environments?

Regarding Mercy, I wonder how individuals and societies can practice Mercy amid today’s fast-paced, high-pressure world. Does the religious concept of Mercy have universal value beyond faith communities? How can Mercy be translated into concrete social actions and policies to address global issues like poverty, war, and environmental crises? Also, how do cultural differences influence the understanding and practice of Mercy? These questions intersect with philosophy, ethics, sociology, and public policy.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more