Week13(extra credit):Technology Assignment--ZHANG XIAOTONG(장효동)

 Summary:

The theme of this experiment was "Observing the Impact of Technology on Daily Life." My partner and I tried to go an entire day without using modern technological products such as smartphones, computers, televisions, and the internet. This was not only an observational task but also a hands-on social experiment to experience the effects of living without technology. Through this experiment, I gained a more intuitive understanding that “technology is not just a tool but a structural part of our lives.”

Interesting Points:

On the day of the experiment, I avoided using smartphones, computers, and the internet from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. To ensure I didn’t cheat, I placed my phone somewhere out of sight and recorded my feelings and behavioral changes by hand.

In the morning, I used a mechanical alarm clock to wake up. I instinctively wanted to check the time on my phone but remembered I wasn’t allowed to use it. While catching the bus, I missed it because I couldn’t use a real-time transit app. In the afternoon, I tried to meet up with a friend, but since I couldn’t contact them, I had to wait at the prearranged location, feeling a bit uneasy and helpless. In the evening, I couldn’t watch videos or use social media to relax, so I felt bored and went to bed earlier than usual.

Through this experiment, I found that many actions I usually do without thinking suddenly became complicated. I truly experienced how deeply modern people rely on technology.

Reflection:

This experiment made me realize that while some technologies like digital clocks and TVs can be replaced, others—like smartphones and navigation apps—have become deeply embedded in our daily lives and are almost indispensable. Technology is no longer just a tool, but a necessary part of our existence. It subtly reshapes our life rhythms and the way we socialize.

Although the day was challenging, it was also highly meaningful. It made me reflect on which technologies are truly essential and which ones are just habits. More importantly, the experience helped me recognize that the ability to reflect on and balance our use of technology is an essential skill for modern living.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more