Week14---Class Discussion -Do you think Wikipedia is a good news site?--HE ZIXUAN

 I. Abstract:

Wikipedia is not a typical news website. It is an encyclopedic collaborative platform designed to record knowledge, events, and concepts rather than publish news in real time. Although it contains many entries about major news events and updates very quickly, it lacks the real-time nature, news editing process, and journalist interview mechanism of traditional news media.

2. Interesting points:

The speed of crowd wisdom is amazing: Wikipedia usually updates relevant entries within minutes after some major events (such as the death of a celebrity, natural disasters, political crises), which is faster than some news websites.

Neutral mechanism vs. subjective reporting: Wikipedia adheres to the "neutral point of view", which is different from the reporting style of many news websites with a stance. It strives to present multiple perspectives rather than one voice.

3. Discussion

Is it possible for a knowledge platform based on collective collaboration like Wikipedia to become a more trusted source of information than traditional news media?

Comments

  1. Lee JaehyunJune 8, 2025 at 9:07 PM

    I believe a knowledge platform like Wikipedia can become a more trusted source than traditional news media. While traditional media often reflects editorial bias, corporate interests, or political agendas, Wikipedia relies on transparent, collaborative editing and verifiability through cited sources. Its content is constantly reviewed and updated by a global community, which can lead to more balanced and comprehensive coverage. Although Wikipedia is not free from flaws or misinformation, its open model allows for quicker corrections and wider participation. As digital literacy grows, people may increasingly value transparency and community-driven knowledge over institutional authority.

    ReplyDelete
  2. wu wenhaoJune 14, 2025 at 10:04 AM

    Hi，HE ZIXUAN
    I really enjoyed reading your post—your point about how fast Wikipedia updates after major events was especially striking. It’s fascinating to think that a crowdsourced platform can sometimes outpace professional newsrooms. One small thought: maybe you could also touch on the challenges that come with that speed, like the risk of misinformation or lack of expert oversight. I think adding that would give readers a fuller picture of why trust in Wikipedia is both impressive and complicated. Great job overall!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more