Week14---Class Discussion -Do you think Wikipedia is a good news site?--SHAO TIANYI (소염일)

 Is Wikipedia a Good News Site?


When thinking about where to get news online, Wikipedia probably isn't the first place that comes to mind. After all, it’s more known as an encyclopedia than a news outlet. Still, it plays an interesting role in how we understand current events. Personally, I wouldn’t call Wikipedia a “news site,” but I do think it’s helpful in some ways when it comes to following what’s going on in the world.

Wikipedia is built around the idea that anyone can edit its pages. That’s both a strength and a weakness. On one hand, major events—like elections, protests, or natural disasters—often get updated quickly, sometimes within hours. But on the other hand, the information isn’t always 100% reliable right away. Since editors rely on outside sources, Wikipedia is usually a step behind actual news websites like BBC or CNN.

What makes Wikipedia useful is the way it brings together different reports and puts them into context. For example, if you’re reading about a political crisis, Wikipedia might give you a timeline, background, and links to sources all in one place. That’s something regular news articles don’t always do. But it’s important to remember: Wikipedia isn’t doing original reporting—it just collects what others have written.

Another thing to keep in mind is that Wikipedia can be edited by anyone. While there are many people checking for accuracy, mistakes and bias can slip through, especially during fast-developing stories. That’s why I think it’s best to use Wikipedia after reading real news articles, not instead of them.

In the end, Wikipedia isn’t a news site in the usual sense. It doesn’t break news or interview people. But it can help readers understand the bigger picture—if you use it carefully.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more