Week14 - I read Chapter 5 again 'The Challenges of Consensus' - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my your own words of materials that I read

 Chapter 5 of Joseph Reagle’s "Good Faith Collaboration" examines how consensus works on Wikipedia. The chapter shows that Wikipedia is not just a knowledge platform but also a place where conflicts—ranging from major cultural debates to minor issues like article naming—are negotiated. Consensus on Wikipedia means general agreement or a lack of strong opposition, not necessarily unanimous support. While the community values open discussion and fact-based reasoning, reaching consensus can be difficult due to the platform’s openness and anonymity, which sometimes leads to disruptive behaviors. Although Wikipedia prefers consensus-building over voting, it acknowledges that voting may be needed in large, diverse groups. Ultimately, Reagle argues that while consensus is an ideal, it is often challenging to achieve in practice, especially in large online communities.


2. Mention of any new, interesting, or unusual items that I learned through lecture.

 I think a interesting point in this chapter is how Wikipedia’s decision-making process is based on consensus rather than simple majority voting. This means that articles and policies are shaped through open discussions where participants aim for general agreement or at least no strong opposition, rather than requiring everyone to agree completely. Such a system encourages respectful dialogue and collaborative problem-solving, even when editors have different opinions or backgrounds. It is also fascinating that Wikipedia’s openness allows anyone to participate, but this can make reaching consensus more complex due to disruptive behaviors or persistent disagreements. For a newcomer, it’s intriguing to see that Wikipedia is not just about writing facts, but also about learning how to communicate, negotiate, and build agreements with a diverse, global community. This collaborative spirit and the challenges it brings are what make Wikipedia a unique and dynamic platform for both sharing and creating knowledge.

3. Identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more.

 First, I think that "Which method of majority rule or consensus is more effective in online communities?" can be an interesting topic. Wikipedia does not simply pursue majority rule, but rather pursues a consensus system that coordinates diverse opinions and makes decisions with minimal opposition. In this process, participants listen to each other's opinions, persuade each other, and sometimes compromise their positions. This experience can help us realize the importance of democratic communication and collaboration.

 I also think that the question "Is consensus actually possible in an online environment with high openness and anonymity?" is also interesting. In a space where anyone can participate like Wikipedia, there are many factors that hinder the formation of consensus, such as trolling and persistent opposition, so we can discuss the limits and conditions of consensus, and ways to supplement them.

Comments

  1. CHEN SIYUJune 1, 2025 at 11:44 PM

    This chapter offers a fascinating look at how consensus-building works on Wikipedia. I was particularly struck by the idea that consensus is not the same as a majority vote—it’s more about general agreement or at least the absence of strong objections. This highlights the importance of dialogue and negotiation in collaborative spaces. It’s also interesting how Wikipedia’s openness allows anyone to contribute, yet this same openness can make reaching consensus harder because of disruptive behavior or conflicting perspectives.

    I think this approach—prioritizing consensus over simple majorities—reflects a more inclusive and democratic way to manage knowledge. However, it also raises an important question: can true consensus really exist in a global, open, and anonymous environment? Trolling and stubborn disagreements can easily disrupt consensus. This tension between openness and collaboration is central to online communities. Maybe future studies can explore how Wikipedia balances these challenges—what strategies or norms help maintain constructive dialogue even when opinions clash.

    Overall, this chapter reminds us that Wikipedia is not just about sharing facts. It’s about working together, respecting different views, and learning to compromise. In a way, it shows that building knowledge together is as much a social process as it is an intellectual one.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more