Week15--Sandbox editor of Wikipedia---CHEN SIYU진사우

 Summary:

We all know that Wikipedia's "sandbox" feature is a very practical tool. It provides a safe and open editing environment that allows users to try various edits and formats without affecting existing pages. For new editors, a sandbox is an excellent learning platform; for experienced editors, it is also an ideal place to draft complex entries or test templates.


Interesting points:

During the use of the sandbox, I discovered some interesting aspects. Firstly, the sandbox is very intuitive, allowing anyone to start editing in just a few seconds, significantly lowering the barrier to editing Wikipedia. Next, the sandbox encourages a "spirit of experimentation." Even if my writing is not standardized enough, it won't affect the official page, and this sense of security instead stimulates my creativity. Finally, the existence of the sandbox also demonstrates Wikipedia's principles of openness, cooperation, and continuous improvement, allowing me to deeply appreciate the power of "many hands make light work."


Discussion:

I believe that a sandbox is not just a technical tool, but also a manifestation of the spirit of the Wikipedia community. It embodies the core values of "free experimentation and shared progress." Through the use of sandboxes, I also realized that Wikipedia is not a lofty "encyclopedia," but a vibrant community of knowledge. The sandbox encourages me to dare to try and share, and it also makes me more aware of the joys of Wikipedia editing.

Of course, the limitation of the sandbox is that too much practice without genuinely committing to item contributions can leave one stuck in the "experimental stage." How to transition from a sandbox to a formal contribution is a question worth continuously pondering for me. Overall, the existence of sandboxes has given me a more intuitive and approachable understanding of Wikipedia editors, and has also made me more willing to engage in the global cause of knowledge sharing. 

Comments

  1. YU JIEJune 17, 2025 at 7:27 AM

    I completely agree with your perspective. The sandbox is not just a technical tool, but also a reflection of Wikipedia’s spirit of encouraging free experimentation and collaboration. Through using the sandbox, I’ve come to deeply understand that Wikipedia is an open, inclusive, and constantly evolving knowledge community. The sandbox provides a safe space for newcomers to practice, allowing us to explore boldly, learn editing rules, and gain experience without pressure. Overall, the sandbox has not only increased my interest in Wikipedia editing, but also deepened my understanding of the platform’s underlying values and philosophy. I look forward to moving from sandbox practice to more formal contributions in the future, and doing my part to support the global sharing of knowledge.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more