Week5--Chapter 6The Benevolent Dictator--LIUJUNYU
As an open collaborative platform where "everyone can edit", Wikipedia often gives people an impression of freedom, openness, and even some anarchism. However, Reagle tells us in Chapter 6 of "Good Faith Collaboration" that Wikipedia is actually a place that attaches great importance to norms, procedures, and community agreements. Here, "freedom" and "order" are not opposed to each other, but closely intertwined.
In this chapter, Reagle deeply explores Wikipedia's talk page and Arbitration Committee, and other mechanisms, revealing how these seemingly trivial pages and procedures have built a stable, credible, and sustainable collaborative environment for Wikipedia. The talk page is not only a place for disputes or debates, but also an important platform for community members to negotiate, clarify their positions, and find consensus. In these places, participants strive to understand each other's intentions with good faith.
Behind this culture, there is a key concept: Wikipedia does not pursue "perfect objectivity", but pursues "neutrality that can be accepted by all parties." This means that the resolution of each dispute is not determined by "who is right or wrong", but by finding a way of expression that is as balanced as possible through dialogue and negotiation.
ArbCom: If the discussion page cannot resolve the dispute, the Arbitration Committee will intervene as a final resort. Although this institution sounds like a formal judicial system, its foundation is still the consensus and conventions within the community. It is more concerned with the maintenance of the "code of conduct" rather than the judgment of the content itself.
Reagle emphasized that the Arbitration Committee embodies the governance philosophy of Wikipedia: decentralized but not chaotic; open and inclusive but not condoning malicious behavior. It is a manifestation of order, but not an authority imposed from top to bottom, but a system that grows from the rules and habits formed spontaneously by the community.
Reflection: What can we learn from Wikipedia?
Reagle's research not only helps us understand the operating mechanism of Wikipedia, but also provides us with inspiration on the governance of the digital public domain. In this Internet age full of "noise", how to create a credible, consultative, and tolerant community with different views is a challenge faced by all platforms. The experience of Wikipedia shows that only by striking a delicate balance between trust, rules and consensus can the vision of open collaboration be truly realized.
Comments
Post a Comment