Week7--Good Faith Collaboration--LIUJUNYU

                                              Good Faith Collaboration

Today, as the Internet shapes the way we communicate, Wikipedia's success as a collaborative writing platform is amazing. Joseph Reagle's book Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia provides a deep and detailed socio-cultural perspective that allows us to understand Wikipedia not only as an encyclopedia project, but also as a new type of network cultural practice. After reading two academic reviews of this book, I have a clearer understanding of the theoretical value and practical significance of this book.


What interests me most is how Reagle regards "goodwill" as the core of Wikipedia's culture. This is not only a moral requirement, but also an institutional prerequisite for the operation of the community. As Christian Pentzold pointed out in his review in "New Media & Society", Reagle does not idealize Wikipedia, but analyzes how it achieves collaboration through various "flexible mechanisms" such as consensus formation, editing guidelines, and cultural norms. This made me realize that the success of an open system depends not only on technology, but also on a set of cultural logics that are believed and practiced.

In another review published by Elizabeth Losh, she emphasized the analysis of the "conflict management" mechanism in the book. Reagle describes how Wikipedia uses basic rules such as "Assume Good Faith" to deal with editing wars and differences of opinion. The design of these systems not only reduces friction, but also makes volunteers willing to participate for a long time. From the perspective of educators, this provides us with a good example of cultivating cooperation skills and public writing ethics.

Especially in the multicultural and cross-lingual Wikipedia community, "consensus" is not a product that is easily reached, but a process of continuous negotiation and compromise. This also makes me think whether promoting public collaboration in the real society also requires a similar "cultural agreement".


My biggest gain from reading the reviews of this book is that the success of Wikipedia is not accidental, but the result of a highly coordinated set of culture, system and technology. Joseph Reagle does not just describe the phenomenon in the book, but uses the multi-dimensional perspectives of sociology, ethics and network culture to construct a new understanding of the concept of "collaboration". In today's environment where we are increasingly dependent on digital collaboration, understanding this practice of "good faith collaboration" can help us think about how to build a healthier and more inclusive online community.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more