wweek16-LYU YANGCHENG2021008895
What did I learn from editing Wikipedia?
As a student, we usually complete learning and demonstrate knowledge through class assignments and after-class tasks. Most of these assignments are closed and do not interact much with the outside world. In this assignment, I was asked to edit Wikipedia, which brought me unprecedented challenges and gains. In the editing process, I not only felt the responsibility of knowledge creation and dissemination, but also improved my writing, critical thinking and teamwork skills through practical operations. Editing Wikipedia not only changed my understanding of writing, but also brought me deep thinking: learning is not only the accumulation of knowledge, but also should be a contribution to the world.
As the world's largest open encyclopedia, Wikipedia covers almost all fields, and anyone can edit and update entries. It is this openness that made me truly experience the spirit of knowledge sharing for the first time. Unlike traditional homework, editing Wikipedia is a social process that emphasizes cooperation and mutual help, which makes me feel that I am no longer an isolated learner, but a member of the knowledge community.
One of the biggest challenges of editing Wikipedia is to ensure the accuracy and neutrality of information. Wikipedia encourages the use of reliable sources to verify information, which is not necessarily required so strictly in traditional homework. In traditional writing, students usually rely on the information given by teachers or their own understanding, while Wikipedia requires that every piece of information must be supported by credible evidence. This strict requirement made me realize that writing is not only about expressing one's own views, but also about being responsible for other people's information. Every time I edit, I have to go back and check all the cited data and sources to ensure that they come from authoritative institutions, which makes me more cautious and responsible when writing.
In the editing process, I also learned how to express complex information more clearly and ensure that they are easy to understand. Many times, Wikipedia readers come from all over the world, involving different cultural backgrounds and language habits. Therefore, how to explain certain academic concepts in concise and straightforward language becomes particularly important. This challenge allows me to continuously optimize my language expression ability in the editing process and learn how to balance professionalism and popularization in writing.
Compared to traditional student homework, the biggest difference in editing Wikipedia is its interactivity and openness. The delivery process of traditional homework is usually closed. After completing the task, students submit it to the teacher, get feedback, and then it ends. On Wikipedia, the edited entries are subject to review and modification from users around the world at any time. Each edit may be further modified or improved by others. This openness makes me feel a strong sense of social responsibility. In this dynamic editing process, I must always keep an open mind and accept criticism and suggestions from others, which also motivates me to continuously improve my writing skills and information judgment.
Compared with traditional academic homework, editing Wikipedia is not just a personal task, it is more like a global collaborative project. Every message I edit may affect thousands of readers. This also makes me realize that as a creator and transmitter of knowledge, I am not only responsible for my own work, but also need to consider the needs and understanding ability of other readers. For example, when adding some technical content, I need to ensure professionalism while translating it into a language that readers can easily understand. This balance makes every edit full of challenges and allows me to recognize the depth and complexity of writing.
Although traditional student homework can help us consolidate knowledge, it often lacks a certain degree of interactivity and fun. Many times we are completing tasks according to the teacher's requirements. The process of editing Wikipedia is full of exploration and challenges. When I started editing, I didn't know exactly what problems I would encounter, nor how the final results would be presented. I needed to find data, organize information, and write entries by myself. In this process, I was not only completing tasks, but also actively learning and exploring. I constantly challenged myself to gain a deeper understanding of the content of a certain field and deepen my understanding of the field by editing entries.
In addition, the feedback mechanism of Wikipedia editing is also a driving force for learning. Whenever I see others make revisions or supplements to my edits, I will not only reflect on my writing seriously, but also improve my understanding and writing level by reading more information. This kind of interactivity and instant feedback makes the editing process of Wikipedia more interesting and meaningful than traditional homework. It not only allows me to gain knowledge, but also allows me to enjoy the fun and sense of achievement in the process. From critical thinking to practical operation: a new understanding of knowledge The process of editing Wikipedia has also given me a deeper understanding of critical thinking. In traditional classrooms, critical thinking is often more reflected in classroom discussions and written papers, and students need to analyze problems from different perspectives. However, in Wikipedia editing, critical thinking runs through the entire process. Every time I come across an entry, I need to evaluate the authenticity and authority of the information by checking a lot of data. This is not only about judging the source of data, but also about how to identify bias and subjective color, which requires me to maintain a high degree of independence and objectivity when editing.
Through this process, I deeply feel the importance of critical thinking. It is not only the ability to analyze and evaluate problems, but also the ability to discover and solve problems. When editing Wikipedia, I constantly encounter problems that require judgment and solution, which enables me to improve my critical thinking ability in actual operation. The editing of each article is a comprehensive exercise of my logical thinking, judgment and writing skills.
Another significant difference between Wikipedia and traditional academic work is the dynamic update of knowledge. In traditional assignments, students often complete tasks based on fixed textbooks and reference materials, while the content of Wikipedia is open and can be continuously updated as new discoveries and new data emerge. This made me realize that knowledge is not static, but constantly changes with the development of time, technology and society. In the editing process, I deeply realized the urgency and challenge of this knowledge update.
For example, when updating an entry in a certain field of science and technology, I will find that many of the original contents are outdated and new research results have been published. To this end, I not only have to find the latest research results in a timely manner, but also compare information from different sources and evaluate its credibility. This process gave me a deeper understanding of the fluidity and updating of knowledge, and also inspired me to maintain the motivation to continue learning. The accumulation of knowledge is not just through books, it is a continuous exploration process. We need to pay attention to and learn new information at any time, and have the courage to update and improve existing cognition.
In the process of editing Wikipedia, I also learned a lot about academic integrity and writing ethics. In traditional academic writing, we usually follow the rules of citation, avoid plagiarism, and ensure that our work is original. However, in the editing of Wikipedia, in addition to following these basic academic integrity norms, we also need to pay special attention to avoiding subjective bias and overly one-sided views. The content of Wikipedia should be fair, objective, and represent the views of all parties. This is a new challenge for me, because on some academic topics, different schools and viewpoints may have great differences. I need to ensure that my editing can be loyal to all viewpoints, rather than just expressing the position of one party.
Academic integrity is not only to avoid plagiarism, but also to ensure that the information we convey is fair, transparent and based on facts. This concept makes me vigilant at all times when editing Wikipedia to avoid potential biases and errors. This not only helps to improve my writing skills, but also gives me a deeper understanding of ethical issues in the academic field.
In the process of editing Wikipedia, I gradually realized that knowledge sharing is not only for personal learning and improvement, but also for the common progress of society. As an open platform, Wikipedia allows everyone to participate in editing and updating. This made me realize that knowledge sharing can not only promote individual development, but also promote the rapid knowledge update of the entire society in the context of diversity and globalization. Behind every entry I participated in editing, there are thousands of readers and potential beneficiaries. This awareness made me realize that as a student, I am not only a learner of knowledge, but also a disseminator and contributor of knowledge.
Every time I edit, I am not just filling in an entry, but also participating in the global knowledge sharing action. The content I edit will be seen and used by people all over the world, which makes as el that has mf el that 硬肉身 has valich makes s el. collective effort, Wikipedia has become a benchmark for knowledge sharing on a global scale, promoting the dissemination of global knowledge and cultural exchanges. As a member of it, I can not only gain personal growth from my member of it, I can not only gain personal growth from my seal alf.
Conclusion
In general, editing Wikipedia not only allows me to learn how to write, organize information and improve critical thinking, but also allows me to have a deeper understanding of the meaning of knowledge dissemination。 from traditional student assignments. It allowed me to no longer be limited to completing tasks, but to integrate myself into the vast network of global knowledge sharing and become a part of it.
Through this assignment, I not only improved my writing skills in the academic field, but also learned how to collaborate, communicate and co-create knowledge with others on an open platform. This way of learning tos way with others on an open platform. This way of learning tos way with others mallows more challenges and fun in the process of participating in knowledge creation with others. Compared with traditional assignments, Wikipedia editing is undoubtedly a more interesting and challenging learning experience.
Editing Wikipedia made me understand that learning is not just about completing tasks in textbooks, but a process of continuous exploration, sharing and reflection. In this process, I am both a learner and a knowledge contri . knowledge and the significance of sharing. I believe that future learning will be more open and interactive, and the experience of editing Wikipedia will become an indispensable part of my learning journey.
Comments
Post a Comment