week10-Recent Wikipedia edits   LYU YANGCHENG2021008895





1 Summary

This week I chose to edit the entry "Political Comics". This is a theme that spans art and politics. It is not only a form of comics, but also a medium for publicly expressing positions and criticisms. I supplemented the entry content from definitions, historical origins to style development, and organized the structure of the original data to make the overall clearer and more logical. Especially in the "Historical Origins" section, I referred to early European comics and publishing examples, and supplemented the contributions of several important cartoonists.


2 Interesting Viewpoints

This time I noticed that "Political Comics" is not just an artistic expression, it also has strong media attributes. Gillray in the 18th century was like a "print media man" who used his brush to make a strong voice of the times. This made me realize that the development of early comics and newspapers is inseparable, and it is a public practice that interweaves images and political public opinion. Today we are accustomed to receiving "memes" or satirical images from social media, but the origins of these images actually appeared in the 18th century.


3 Thoughts of this week

This editing experience made me think about a question: When we add content to Wikipedia, are we also "participating in the discourse of knowledge"? Political comics, as a marginal but powerful medium, have often been ignored in the past, but they actually play an irreplaceable role in promoting social public opinion and public dialogue. Through this supplement, I feel like I am reorganizing a historical context, piecing together those seemingly fragmentary images, events and names into a complete knowledge map.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2025) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incor...
Read more

Week 1. My Recent Wikipedia Edits - Jeong seolah (정설아)

I made several edits to the Wikipedia page for 'Daegu'.  Daegu, located in the southeastern part of South Korea, is the third-largest urban area in the country, following Seoul and Busan. With a population exceeding 2.3 million, it is the fourth-largest metropolitan city in South Korea and the second-largest in the Yeongnam region after Busan. Often referred to together with the surrounding North Gyeongsang Province as Daegu-Gyeongbuk, this region is home to over 5 million residents. Known for its rich history and vibrant economy, Daegu stands as a key player in South Korea's cultural and industrial landscape. Below is a summary of the changes I contributed. 1) Summarize and link Sights Section:  - Improved clarity by changing “mountains keep many traditional temples” to “the mountains keep many traditional temples.” Mosque Controversy Section:  - Simplified a sentence by removing “and of the authorities.” Festivals Section:  - Made phrasing smoother by changing “tho...
Read more

Week4 - Review about the readings for the next week. - Jo HyeonSeong (조현성)

 1. Summarize in my own words of materials. The book is primarily about the openness of Wikipedia. Openness means that anyone can participate in the creation and editing of articles without any qualifications. Openness can be a double-edged sword. While it means that you can edit without having expert knowledge of a topic, it also means that you can participate even if you have expert knowledge. For experts, articles written by non-experts can come across as inaccurate knowledge, which can anger experts. This anger can also be a catalyst for Wikipedia to continue to improve. However, articles edited only by non-experts can cause misunderstandings and convey incorrect information, so openness can be considered a double-edged sword. In fact, it sometimes causes some conflict, such as Wales' negative stance. Openness also means freedom from copyright, which means anyone can take it and use it anywhere. That is why the knowledge of non-experts can have greater impact. That is why appro...
Read more